Can I breast feed following breast augmentation?

Breastfeeding is a vital function, with numerous psychological, physiologic, anatomical, social, and cultural factors. Breast milk is an optimal and complete food for newborns up to 6 months of age, not only because of the nutrients that it provides but also because of the antibodies transmitted by the mother and the affective bond created between the mother and child, which promotes sensory and cognitive development, in addition to protecting the infant against infectious and chronic diseases, according to the World Health Organization

One of the concerns many young women face is whether to have a breast augmentation before starting their families or leave the decision until later in life. 

Mr Ross always advises patients that they should wait until after completing their families before considering breast surgery. There are however some women whose confidence is so affected by the size of their breasts that they would rather consider breast augmentation prior to thinking about having a family. In this scenario one of the commonest questions asked is whether breast augmentation can affect the ability to breast feed.

A recent study from Argentina looked at 100 patients with breast implants and compared the chance of breast feeding to 100 women without implants. The principal objective was to evaluate the incidence of breastfeeding at 30 days. The results showed that most patients with breast implants 93 percent compared to 99 percent without implants were able to establish breastfeeding. There was more chance of exclusive lactation with breast augmentation through an inframammary scar vs a periraeola scar although location of the breast implant did not seem to have any affect.

All women must be aware that there may be a decrease in the possibility of breast feeding following breast augmentation although in this study the chance of breast feeding with implants was 93%. 

It is important to consider all the pros and cons of breast surgery and be empowered to make a decision to proceed or not. Mr Ross will always take you through the pros and cons and the breast augmentation options using biodiemnsional analysis, 3D technology and Virtual Reality to help you in the decision making process.

 

Reference

Filiciani S, Siemienczuk GF, Nardín JM, Cappio B, Albertengo AC, Nozzi G, Caggioli M. Cohort Study to Assess the Impact of Breast Implants on Breastfeeding.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Dec;138(6):1152-1159.

 

Breast rejuvenation surgery – what are the options?

Breast rejuvenation surgery has long been one of the most popular surgical procedures among women. While breast rejuvenation surgery has remained consistently popular, what has changed is the number of options available to women looking to improve the aesthetic appearance of their breasts. Technical innovations and procedure improvements mean that there are more accessible tailor-made options for individual patients and less downtime after the procedure itself. Mr Ross will always discuss the many options available to a patient before they decide on the best course of action to suit that individual’s needs. 

Here are the rejuvenation options we share with out patients: 

 

BREAST IMPLANTS: 

Among the most popular choices, breast implants are available in a wide range of shapes, sizes and profiles to accommodate nearly everybody. Breast implants allow for a patient to determine the size, shape and profile she wants, and will normally give an excellent result. Breast implants do come with risks and may need to be replaced after several years.

 

MASTOPEXY:

A mastopexy procedure involves lifting the breast, and so is also known as an uplift. A mastopexy can be paired with an implant if the patient wishes to increase the breast size too. A standard mastopexy aims to rejuvenate the appearance of the breasts and provide a more youthful look. A mastopexy is common in patients who’s breasts have sagged due to pregnancy or having large breasts. 

 

AUTOLOGOUS FAT TRANSFER (AFT):

AFT to breasts involves removing excess fat from one part of the body and putting it into the breasts. This procedure rejuvenates the breasts without the use of implants. AFT to breasts can be used to increase the size and volume of the breasts, or to provide a more youthful appearance. 

 

Mr Ross will always discuss all of the available options with his patients in great detail and will always make sure that each patient is aware of the pros and cons and risks with each surgery. Mr Ross advises his patients to be in good general health and at their ideal weight before considering surgery, as it is important to be in a stable bodily condition when proceeding with cosmetic surgery. For more information on any of the procedures Mr Ross offers, book in for a consultation with and start your journey towards a more rejuvenated and youthful you.

Breast Reconstruction following mastectomy

Breast reconstruction combines all aspects of plastic, reconstructive and aesthetic practice.

The diagnosis of breast cancer can be devastating and the decisions regarding reconstruction are often seen as a secondary consideration. The pros and cons of immediate and delayed reconstruction (after mastectomy) are one of the most challenging that face patients with a diagnosis of breast cancer. A careful discussion with the patient is imperative to guide the patient in the decision making process. This often requires multiple consultations within the context of a multidisciplinary oncological team.

Breast reconstruction can be provided by both autologous and non-autologous tissue and a combination of both techniques. Non-autologous methods of reconstruction include the use of tissue expanders and implants. 

Autologous reconstruction uses ones own tissue. The advantages of using ones own tissue is that the tissue ages naturally and the reconstruction changes minimally with time. 

Initially an autologous reconstruction may be more time consuming than non-autologous reconstruction in terms of surgical time and recovery, however the benefits often outweigh the risks. It is important to discuss the pros and cons of autologous and non-autologous reconstructions with each patient individually to determine suitability.

For autologous breast reconstruction the gold standard technique is the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP), which is a modification of the transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap (TRAM). With newer techniques to protect the muscle and its function (DIEP), tissue from the abdomen can be used to reshape the breast with minimal side effects to the abdomen. The tissue that would normally be excised during a cosmetic tummy tuck is dissected carefully with its blood supply (the diep inferior epigastric artery) to avoid damage to the tummy muscles creating a flap of tissue. Blood vessels in the chest or the armpit are also dissected free and the artery and veins of the veins in the chest and the veins in the tummy tissue are sutured together using fine suture material under a microscope. The tummy is closed in the same way as a tummy tuck or abdominoplasty (link) and the new tummy tissue is reshaped onto the chest wall to create a new breast. The use of tissue from other areas of the body can also be used such as the though and the buttock and the pros and cons of these need to be discussed at consultation. These include the TMG (from the thigh), the SGAP and the IGAP (from the buttock)

Other autologous options for breast reconstruction include the use of tissue from the back (Latissimus Dorsi flap). In this scenario the back muscle and the skin overlying it is passed onto the front of the breast and the back is closed. The back tissue may provide enough tissue to mould a breast shape but often requires an implant. 

Implant based reconstruction using autologous or non-autologous dermis may also be used to reconstruct breast tissue. This can be used in patients who wish to have a simple solution following mastectomy in the immediate phase although it is not recommended where patients require radiotherapy or where a mastectomy has already been performed.

The most important aspects of breast reconstruction include size, shape and symmetry. The initial operation provides the basis with which the surgeon can mould the final result. Often a second operation is required in order to achieve these goals. With increasing refinements a combination of lip modelling, combining liposuction (removal of fat) (link) and autologous fat transfer (injection of fat) (link) the new breast can be remodelled to give an even more natural result. This can be combined with a nipple reconstruction and areola tattooing to give a result that is similar in size, shape and symmetry. In unilateral reconstruction it may be necessary to perform surgery to the unaffected breast to give symmetry. This is often in the form of a mastopexy (link), breast reduction (link) or mastopexy implant (link)

The advent of microsurgery in the field of plastic, aesthetic and cosmetic practice has made the provision of this form of autologous reconstruction more widely available. Although it is not suitable for everyone and can never replace the original breast tissue, those that choose this form of surgery benefit from longer lasting breast aesthetics and abdominal contour. 

With all aesthetic surgery autologous breast reconstruction is not without its inherent risks and these need to be discussed with surgeons experienced in providing this highly specialised form of breast reconstruction.

The reconstructions need to be tailored to each patients individualised needs following discussion regarding the pros and cons of each technique.

 

 Breast Reconstruction following lumpectomy

Following lumpectomy there may be asymmetry between the breasts. Common treatments include the use of autologous fat transfer (link) or reshaping the affected breast in the form of a mastopexy (link). Where asymmetry is more marked there may also be a need to combine these and perform surgery on the unaffected breast to aid symmetry in terms of volume (breast reduction link). Occasionally autologous and non-autologous methods of reconstruction can be used to help reconstruct defects following lumpectomy as described above. In severe cases it may be necessary to complete a mastectomy in order to obtain a pleasing aesthetic result.