BAPRAS Breast Awareness Week

BAPRAS Breast Special Interest Group Chair Gary Ross comments on how BAPRAS is helping patients to make informed decisions about breast reconstruction The Angelina Jolie effect (1) has had a long-lasting and global impact, and appears to have increased referrals for genetic testing to centres appropriately since her surgery last May. Although not all patients will be suitable for prophylactic mastectomy there is an increased awareness of the risks and increasingly patients are requesting preventive surgery.

The commonest form of reconstruction following prophylactic mastectomy globally is implant based reconstruction either in combination with autologous flap coverage or with non autologous mesh / matrix coverage over the lower pole of the implant. A national audit of the practice and outcomes of immediate implant based reconstruction currently aims to evaluate the variations in techniques and outcomes. There has been a large uptake amongst plastic surgeons in the iBRA (implant based reconstruction audit) study and BAPRAS remains focused on improving patient safety through validated outcomes. The choice of immediate reconstruction following mastectomy with implants needs to be weighed up against autologous forms of reconstruction such as the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP) and allow patients an informed decision as how best to proceed in both the short and long term. Earlier this year BAPRAS produced guidance relating to the very rare (Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma) ALCL and its association with breast implants.

We still remain focused on the need for an implant registry that will allow more robust data relating to specific issues such as ALCL and provide valuable information for clinicians and patients alike. Reference 1. The Angelina Jolie effect: how high celebrity profile can have a major impact on provision of cancer related services. Evans GR et al Breast Cancer Research 2014,16:442

Download Article

Expert Advice On Removing Implants

Breast implants age just as our bodies age and with time there are changes that occur. Often these changes cause minimal disruption to patients but pain, discomfort and visible change to implants can occur.

 

Download Article

 

Make Me Over

COSMETIC expert, Mr. Gary Ross, has recently been awarded ‘Best for Breast and Tummies’ in the 2015 Tatler Beauty & Cosmetic Surgery Guide, and has received global recognition through RealSelf as being one of the top 100 doctors. Here we talk to the plastic surgeon about the every-popular ‘mommy makeover’ as a rejuvenation procedure.

 

Download Article

How Can Cosmetic Patients Be Empowered To Make An Informed Choice?

Choosing a surgeon and the importance of outcomes and new techniques.

Never before have clinicians been more highly regulated. Doctors in particular must set the standard against which others are to be judged. The production of clinical outcomes is an essential part of a doctors appraisal and revalidation and increasingly we need to provide these for patients (see link to my outcomes). Patients should be guided by these outcomes in choosing a surgeon.

New techniques are increasingly being scrutinised within aesthetic practice. The use of autologous fat transfer for breast augmentation is one such procedure. Mr Ross in this article explains the limitations of such a procedure and how new techniques can be incorporated into clinical practice. It is important that patients are given adequate information and undergo a detailed consent process in order that they can be empowered to make decisions regarding new techniques.

 

Download Article

 

Body Contouring Surgery Following Weight Loss

There has been a rapid increase in Body rejuvenation techniques in weight loss surgery. Mr Ross explains in this article the different options for patients, whom to choose and talks about the pros and cons of the different options.

 

Download Article

 

Treatment In Focus: Brachioplasty

Often excess skin or fat can be a problem for patients in the upper arms. It can lead to patients limiting the clothes they wear ; women especially find the aging changes related to the upper arm disturbing. The most common complaint is not feeling comfortable wearing short sleeves or not liking the appearance of the arm/chest junction in a bra. Providing an improved contour in the upper arms can rejuvenate the upper arm and provide an improvement to a patient’s quality of life.

This excess fat and/or skin in the upper arms can lead to poor definition of the arm/chest junction. Excess tissue at this junction can also lead to a discomfort in bras and can be both uncomfortable and unsightly. For patients with excessive weight loss arm lifting can be combined with other procedures in other areas of the body.

The location of excess fat and skin and the quality of skin of the arms and chest wall often determine what are the best options are for patients. Liposuction on its own can reduce the volume of fat and where skin tightening is performed simultaneously improvements may be gained. Usually in the upper arms excess skin is present and surgical excision in combination with liposuction is often the only reliable way to improve contour.

Where only skin excess is apparent surgical removal offers a permanent solution.
With surgical removal scars need to be placed in the armpit.There may be only a short scar limited within the armpit – short scar armlift. Often the scar needs to be extended but this can be limited to avoid extending thescar towards the elbow – armlift with limited incision. For excess fat and skin one often needs to extend the scar down the arm and/or down the chest – armlift with extended scar. It is important to place these scars in such a way that it is difficult to visualise these.

Short scar arm lifting with placement of scars in the armpit gives limited results and does not address excess tissue on the chest or the majority of the skin of the upper arm.There are also occasions where patients are not happy with a bulge in the upper part of the chest near the armpit.Where this is not related to issues of skin and fat excess in the upper arm a short scar arm lift can help to improve this contour by a short scar approach.

For the majority, armlifting requires a scar that extends down the arm.This can be limited or can be extended down to the elbow, into the armpit and down the side of the chest.This scar often heals extremely well although it can take a number of months / years for the scar to fade into a white line.The scars can often be initially tight and it is important for patients to mobilise immediately to prevent any form of contracture. In the armpit and the upper part of the arm there is a tendency for the scars to stretch. For patients these scars are very well tolerated and it is extremely uncommon for patients to complain about these scars long term.

It is rare for skin excess to be present in the forearm and one must weigh up the pros and cons of removing any excess tissue below the elbow that would require a scar that crosses the elbow. Scars that cross joints can cause contracture and may result in limited mobility.

Arm lifting can be performed alongside other body rejuvenation procedures and it is important to discuss these options with someone with experience in all body contouring procedures. It is recommended that all surgical times should be less than 4 hours to limit anaesthetic issues. For the majority of arm lifts the procedure is carried out under general anaesthetic. Although there is swelling and some discomfort arm lifting is relatively not a painful procedure. Patients may be able to go home the same day and currently I do not use any drains and use minimal dressings.The reduction in drains and dressings allows patients to mobilise immediately.The recovery following arm lifting is relatively quick. It is uncommon to develop excess swelling (seroma) and although there may be small areas of the scar that take some time to heal the wound complications are usually minimal.

 

Download Article

 

Breast Cancer Awareness Month

Breast Cancer Awareness Month As part of breast cancer awareness month Mr Ross has published alongside the Genesis in Manchester looking at the role of contralateral mastectomy for breast cancer prevention. (link to publication list). Drawing awareness to the role of prevention and helping patients who have had a diagnosis of breast cancer or a potential risk of breast cancer and providing adequate information is an essential part of care. Only with accurate information will patients be empowered to make their own decisions.

Mr Ross has been featured in BAPRAS voice discussing how patient focused models of care is changing treatment for the better:-

”Breast cancer remains the most common malignancy for women in the UK and the leading cause of death for women aged 34-54. Increasingly genetic testing has been used to help determine risk and target women who can be offered treatment prior to the development of breast cancer. Recommendations are available through the recently published NICE guidance For patients who develop malignancy in one breast genetic testing can also help to determine risk and target women who can be offered treatment to prevent the chance of another malignancy in the opposite or contralateral breast. Although through the 1990s there has been a shift from mastectomy to breast conservation, the rates of mastectomy – especially of the contralateral breast – appear to have increased. The management of the contralateral breast remains controversial and we have recently published evidence to suggest that a survival advantage does exist for patients who are genetically tested positive for the BRCA 1/2 mutation carriers who have chosen to undergo contralateral mastectomy.

Patients are increasingly more aware of the advancements in the management of breast cancer and across the UK there remains a need to provide patients with unbiased, evidence based advice on the pros and cons of contralateral mastectomy. The decisions need to be discussed at a multidisciplinary meeting and require the involvement of dedicated breast care nurses and patient support groups. Together a patient focused model of care will allow patients to make important choices in their own management.

Having encouraged patient empowerment and patient focused groups throughout my career, the Breast Cancer support group ‘Keeping Abreast’ is one example of a successful patient support model. It has enabled a number of my patients, who have helped each other through the reconstructive process, to further develop this patient focused model across cities such as Manchester. Keeping Abreast was founded in 2007 in Norwich, by three women who recognised the need for peer support for women living with breast cancer. It is crucial for women both newly diagnosed with breast cancer and facing the possibility of mastectomy, as well as those considering reconstructive surgery, to meet and talk with women who have been through similar experiences and view reconstructions first hand.&lquo;

The launch in Manchester for keeping abreast was highly successful and there is hope that this avenue of patient delivered care will be developed further in Manchester.

Liposuction – The power of water

Liposuction is a technique that removes fat from unwanted areas. The key to liposuction is to abstract the correct amount of fat, to cause the least disturbance of neighbouring tissue, to leave the person’s fluid balance undisturbed and to cause the least discomfort to the patient. Mechanical energy has been the mainstay of liposuction for many years but modern refinements utilising ultrasound, laser and water assisted techniques have helped to improve outcomes. By using additional energy sources one is able to disturb the neighbouring tissues less and reduce the discomfort. Patients tend to experience less bruising and swelling than traditional liposuction.

Further refinements have seen the increasing use of tumescent fluid to enable removal of large volumes of fat. Again this is to aid patient recovery and comfort however the use of often large volumes of fluid to improve results need to be carefully monitored in a facility with dedicated postoperative monitoring and care. Although liposuction can be performed under either local anaesthesia or general anaesthesia, postoperatively patients should be monitored closely to limit the complications resulting from fluid imbalance. Liposuction can be performed on any area of the body although for women it is most commonly performed on the abdomen and thighs and for men abdomen and flanks. Liposuction can also be performed in addition to facial surgery e.g. facelifts and neck lifts, breast surgery e.g. breast reduction / mastopexy and body rejuvenation surgery e.g. abdominoplasty and arm/thigh lift.

Liposuction remains one of the most commonly performed operations in cosmetic surgery, however it is important for patients to consult with a plastic surgeon with experience in liposuction and other body rejuvenation procedures. The pros and cons of local / general anaesthesia, types of liposuction, alternative procedures and additional non surgical / surgical treatments need to be discussed. Patients should be weight stable and at their ideal weight before considering liposuction and it should not be seen as quick fix to reduce fat. Judging the correct amount of fat to remove remains one of the most important decisions in order to limit complications.

One of the commonest errors is removal of too much fat or to perform the technique on patients with excess skin. With the right patient selection liposuction is an excellent tool to reduce unwanted fat and is best performed on isolated areas of fat and in patients with good quality skin. Choosing the right patient will help reduce the skin irregularities that occur following liposuction which remains the biggest concern long term. If liposuction is performed alone the incisions used are determined by the liposuction technique and the size of the cannula although they are usually no more than 0.5 – 1cm in length. The incisions can be well hidden and can be either sutured or left open. It is rare for patients to notice these incisions in the long term. Although non-invasive methods of liposuction exist and may be useful in certain patients the pros and cons of these techniques need to be discussed alongside the pros and cons of traditional invasive techniques. For the right patient liposuction provides excellent results and these results are often improved by the use of compression garments that help in the postoperative phases to reduce swelling and discomfort.

Further improvements in liposuction mean that patients can have the fat that has been removed injected into other areas of the body such as the breast, buttocks and face. Liposuction can thus now be seen as liposculpture and an important adjunctive tool in body rejuvenation

 

Download Article

 

Treatment in Focus: Mastopexy

The breast has a tendency to age due to a combination of tissue changes in the skin, breast tissue, the ligaments within the breast, the position on the chest wall and the size of the nipple/areolar. Changes to these tissues occur most acutely with fluctuation in weight, and pre/post pregnancy. Mastopexy is a technique used to lift and change the tissues of the breast. Each component of the breast can be lifted and each component needs to be addressed individually. The consultation must take into account the patients ideal size and a discussion regarding previous shape and desired shape. Often breasts are slightly different both in terms of size and shape and the position of the nipples. The crucial question is whether there is enough volume of current breast tissue to provide the desired size and the position of the nipple areola complex. Where volume is deficient and the nipple areola is sitting in a reasonable position anatomically shaped implants may be able to give the perception that the nipple areola has been lifted. It may be over time that patients may require a lift subsequently but in some scenarios a good result can be obtained by breast augmentation only. Where the nipple areola is sitting low and the volume of the breast is satisfactory a mastopexy can improve the shape and position of the breast. The overall size and shape needs to be tailored to the individual using methods to minimise risk to the blood supply to the tissues. The breast mound is designed in order that the breast can be lifted into a new position. The skin is re-draped over the breast and the nipple/areolar size adjusted to the needs of the patients. Sometimes the nipples need be lifted a considerable distance in combination with the breast tissue. Often the nipples point into the armpit and these need to be relocated centrally at the same time. Contour defects as a result of stretching of the breast ligaments needs to be addressed by relocating the breast tissue higher up the muscle on the chest wall.

Mastopexy Methods

There are a number of different ways of performing a mastopexy and these are determined by the incisions performed. The donut or benelli mastopexy is performed through a scar placed around the areola. It may be used to increase the height of the nipple areola by 2-3 cm. It does have a tendency to form stretched scars but does not involve a vertical incision. The lollipop mastopexy is performed via a scar around the areolar and a vertical incision. It is useful in patients where there is no need to remove excess skin. The nipple areola can be lifted significantly higher than in a benelli mastopexy. Where there is significant excess skin and the breast tissue and nipple areola need to be raised significantly an anchor scar mastopexy is the proffered rejuvenation technique. The scars are place around the areola and a vertical scar that meets a horizontal scar in the crease/ fold of the breast. Where the nipple areola complex has dropped and there is also insufficient volume one should consider a combination of a mastopexy with an implant or autologous fat transfer. This can be done as a one stage procedure using the mastopexy techniques described above. Autologous fat transfer involves the removal of fat from the body and transferring it into the breast to try and give extra projection at the upper part of the breast which is the place that is usually most empty. Autologous fat transfer does allow patients the potential of an increase in volume without an implant but often patients may require more than one treatment of autologous fat transfer and the volume improvements are not as predictable as an implant. Using an implant at the same time as a mastopexy in a one stage operation is an excellent means of providing breast rejuvenation in patients who want a moderate increase in volume. For patients wishing to have a dramatic increase in size and wish to have large implants or in those who need the nipple areola lifting considerably mastopexy implant is better performed as a 2 stage operation. Patients undergoing any form of breast lift should be aware that the breast will sit high on the chest wall and will drop over time. Usually this can take 3 months. All the operations described above are usually performed under general anaesthetic. Patients are usually able to drive after a week and may start gentle exercises at this time building up to normal exercising by 4 weeks. A consultation regarding the pros and cons of mastopexy will help to clarify the expectations of patients and provide results that are achievable to meet these expectations. One should consider all the possible options, and if consulting with myself, one will be able to look at results related to all the operations above and make an informed decision

 

Download Article

 

Thigh Rejuvination

Often excess skin or fat can be a problem for patients in the thigh area and thigh rejuvenation is being more frequently requested. For patients with excessive weight loss thigh lifting can be combined with other procedures in other areas of the body.

The distribution of excess fat and skin and the quality of skin of the thighs will often determine what the best options for patients are. Surgical treatments combining skin tightening and fat removal without skin excision may offer some promise and a discussion regarding the pros and cons should be addressed in any consultation relating to thigh rejuvenation. Liposuction on its own can provide some skin tightening and the perception of skin rejuvenation, although where excess skin is present surgical excision is often the only reliable way to improve contour. If there is excess fat only liposuction can be used, although patients must be aware that excessive fat removal alone will often lead to visible skin excess that may only be correctable by surgical excision at a second stage.

There are many areas of the thighs that can be troublesome to patients but most often it is the appearance of the thighs from the front. The appearance of the thighs from behind and rejuvenation in this area only is less frequently requested although for some the appearance of the thighs all the way around the body is of concern. The most frequently requested rejuvenation procedures on the thighs are for excess skin and/or fat in the inner and/or outer thighs.

It is important for patients to discuss the various options and pros and cons of thigh lifting, liposuction, buttock lifting and total body lifting when considering surgery for thigh rejuvenation. Each of the techniques has pros and cons and help to address different areas.

Traditionally the terminology of thigh lifting has been applied to an inner thigh lift where the scars are placed in the groin crease and/or a vertical line along the inside of the leg. The extent and the position of the scar need to address the skin excess present and the needs of the patient.

If the patient has good quality skin a thigh lift using a groin incision may be sufficient in combination with liposuction to give a pleasing result. If excessive skin is present a vertical scar may be a better option. The vertical scar can be limited or extended depending on what one is trying to achieve. It is not recommended that the scar go past the knee.

Thigh lifting can also be performed from under the buttock crease or the thighs can be lifted by incisions above the buttocks. In certain circumstances a total body lift is a good option in addressing the upper thighs. In a total body lift the scars are placed all the way around the body. Where there is excessive skin excess in the upper thighs in combination with excess tissue all the way around the body a total body lift remains a good option. Often scars in the buttock crease can be become troublesome and the pros and cons of thigh lifting via this method should be discussed with the patient.

With modern surgical techniques recovery following thigh lifting is relatively short. It is uncommon to require drains and although it is recommended that thigh lifting be performed using general anaesthetic, patients are able to mobilise as soon as they have recovered from the anaesthetic.

Thigh rejuvenation may involve many different options and a consultation regarding all these different options will help you make a decision as to what the best option is for you.

 

Download Article