While we recover from the COVID-19 outbreak and in order to protect patient safety we are encouraging all patients to consider virtual consultations. Please contact us by clicking the link below and filling out our contact form for further details about arranging a virtual or face to face consultation. CONTACT US

On The Face Of It: Face lifts

Face lifts often get a bad press, but techniques have changed and these days, if you pick the right surgeon, it is possible to achieve a very natural looking result. In this article, Mr Gary Ross explains his approach to face and neck lifting.

Many non-surgical treatments and minimally invasive face and neck lifting techniques have been introduced into cosmetic practice over recent years. A consultation regarding facial rejuvenation must involve the pros and cons of these alongside the pros and cons of classic face lifting and neck lifting procedures.

The aim of facial rejuvenation is to change and improve appearance and produce a long lasting, natural looking result, with as little down time as possible. Although non-surgical treatments and minimally invasive face lifting is effective in slowing the ageing process within our formative years, as we get older classical face and neck lifting is often the only procedure that can address the ageing lower face and neck adequately.

The classic signs of jowl formation, prominence of the nasolabial angle, blunting of the jaw line and fullness under the chin are best addressed by modern face and neck lifting techniques using the classic approach.

Modern techniques in face lifting address mainly the layer underneath the skin and above the muscle, which is called the SMAS layer. Minimal skin excision is required with an emphasis on redraping of the skin following the SMAS lift.

The windswept look, with change in earlobe position and stretched scarring as a result of skin face lifts only still occurs in very rare and unfortunate cases and is easily avoidable.

The effects of ageing lead to an increase in subcutaneous fat deposition in the jowls and the nasolabial creases. These descend in a vertical fashion and for face lifting the SMAS needs to preferentially lifted in a vertical fashion.

Because we lose tissue with age, the SMAS layer should be remoulded rather than removed to improve facial contour. Autologous fat may also be required to improve the volume of the face.

The neck is one of the most difficult areas to address and must be considered in all patients consulting for facial rejuvenation, as an ageing neck can let down a youthful face. To lift the neck, one must consider not only the repositioning of the SMAS layer but also the repositioning of the platsyma layer that is a continuation of the SMAS layer in the neck.

As the platysma ages and weakens the fat under the chin becomes more prominent – often this fat needs to be removed by either an open approach or by liposuction. Where liposuction is required to reduce fat in the jowls, under the chin and on the neck, the fat can be redistributed into other areas such as the cheek, lips or chin to provide an overall rejuvenated effect.

As previously mentioned, the platysma layer is a continuation of the SMAS layer and therefore the platysma also needs to be lifted in a vertical plane via suspension methods. Finally one must also consider the chin and the angle of the jaw and where required a genioplasty, or chin augmentation, may be required.

The face/neck interface must be addressed in all consultations regarding facial rejuvenation. Although non-surgical treatments and minimal access face lifting provide a useful adjunct in the fight against the ageing process, the pros and cons of classic facelifting using modern techniques provide a long lasting result with minimal downtime and may be more likely to achieve the expectations of the patient.


Download Article


Contact Us Now

View Our Case Studies

Media Features

Member Of

Find Us

BMI Alexandra
Mill Lane, Cheshire SK8 2PX
The Christie Clinic
550 Wilmslow Road
Manchester, M20 4BX